In a characteristically fierce, highly provocative intervention that has ignited an intense, continent-wide debate on Pan-Africanism, the Commander-in-Chief of the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF), Julius Malema, has thoroughly condemned the targeting of African migrants in South Africa.
Taking a direct, uncompromised jibe at both local anti-immigration pressure groups and the South African government, Malema used a high-profile press conference to mock the narrative that foreign nationals are the primary drivers of localized unemployment, following the high-stakes evacuation of 300 Ghanaians from Johannesburg.
"The Ghanaians Are Gone—Show Me the Jobs!"
Malema did not mince words, utilizing a sharp mathematical analogy to dismantle what he termed a "myth and a lie" perpetuated by populist leaders to weaponize the frustrations of unemployed local youth.
Directing his focus to the physical departure of the first state-chartered flight to Accra, the EFF leader demanded an immediate economic reality check from his compatriots:
"They tell the youth 'you are not unemployed because of us [the ruling class], go to these Africans who are taking your jobs.' Okay, the Ghanaians are gone now—300 of them. Someone must tell me, how many South Africans got those 300 jobs that were supposedly taken by the Ghanaians?
Because the foreigners have left. How many 300 jobs were created this morning after they left? It is just a myth, it is a dangerous lie which they are using to further divide us and perpetuate the exact same colonial divisions that were structurally forced on us in the past."
Accusing the Mahama Administration of a "Dishonest Overreaction"
While Malema stood firmly as a shield for African migrants inside South Africa, he was equally unsparing in his critique of President John Dramani Mahama’s emergency rescue operation.
The EFF leader argued that by executing a rapid, high-profile physical evacuation, the Ghanaian government essentially played right into the hands of a small faction of local vigilantes. He claimed that Accra’s dramatic exit framework generalized a localized law enforcement failure, creating a highly unfair global impression of South African society as a whole:
The Call for Diplomatic Patience: Malema asserted that the physical evacuation was executed "too quickly," bypassing deep, constructive bilateral engagement: "The President of Ghana should have given us some time to really deal with this matter and get to the bottom of it. We don't have to respond the same way they did. We think the Ghanaian government overreacted, and to overreact in that manner is largely dishonest."
A Failure of Law Enforcement: Acknowledging the raw fear that drove the evacuation—including a widely publicized account of a Ghanaian woman who fled because local police stood by idly while she was assaulted—Malema insisted that the solution lies in enforcing domestic laws, not clearing out fellow Africans: "The Ghana response was not necessary because it now creates the impression that we are all like that, when it is a certain section of our society that needs to be heavily contained by law enforcement."
MALEMA'S PAN-AFRICAN DISCOURSE AT A GLANCE:
┌───────────────────────────────┐ ┌───────────────────────────────┐
│ DOMESTIC CRITIQUE │ │ DIPLOMATIC REBUKE │
├───────────────────────────────┤ ├───────────────────────────────┤
│ • Mass unemployment is a state│ ── │ • Ghana's rapid evacuation │
│ failure, not a migrant issue│ ── │ was a "dishonest overreact" │
│ • Expelling 300 traders caps │ │ • Generalizes South Africans │
│ zero structural job growth │ │ instead of targeting mobs │
└───────────────────────────────┘ └───────────────────────────────┘
The ideological friction points are intensifying, especially after South African immigration authorities dropped a highly controversial claim ahead of the flight's departure, asserting that only 10 of the 300 Ghanaian evacuees possessed fully legal immigration status, while the remaining 290 had allegedly overstayed or lacked proper documentation.
.png)
0 Comments